Sunday, November 9, 2014

Review: Perfect Lies (Mind Games, #2)

Author: Kiersten White
Series: Mind Games, #2
Publisher: HarperTeen
Release: Feb 18th 2014
Source: Borrowed
Pages: 230 (hardcover)
( Amazon | Goodreads )
Annie and Fia are ready to fight back.

The sisters have been manipulated and controlled by the Keane Foundation for years, trapped in a never ending battle for survival. Now they have found allies who can help them truly escape. After faking her own death, Annie has joined a group that is plotting to destroy the Foundation. And Fia is working with James Keane to bring his father down from the inside.

But Annie's visions of the future can't show her who to trust in the present. And though James is Fia's first love, Fia knows he's hiding something. The sisters can rely only on each other - but that may not be enough to save them.

The first thing you should know is that I absolutely loved MIND GAMES. And then here comes the second thing, I hated PERFECT LIES. Ha.

Never has a sequel disappointed me as much as PERFECT LIES did. When I read MIND GAMES, I was thoroughly intrigued by White's slightly peculiar writing style and the premise of evil organizations controlling teenage girls who have psychic abilities. Most of all, I adored the dual sister protagonists - Fia and Annie. The only issue I had then was that the worldbuilding was rather weak. But hey, that's what a sequel is for right? More in-depth plot/character developments, more dramatic confrontations, and more mind-boggling conspiracies. The answer is NO

Not only did PERFECT LIES stumble worse than MIND GAMES on the worldbuilding aspect, it also lost its magic with the characters. Both Fia and Annie felt overwhelmingly mediocre and bland when instead I should be falling head over heels for their sibling bonds, especially now that Fia and Annie are separated from each other. Though, their voices are remarkably easy to tell apart despite the dual narratives, with Fia's narration always confusing and unhinged while Annie's calm and unruffled. But still, they never managed to grab my attention somehow.

Similar to MIND GAMES, White once again used dual timelines on top of dual narratives. However, although this decision was quite ingenious in MIND GAMES, it turned out to be a disaster for me in PERFECT LIES. It was a constant struggle for me to remember which "present" the characters were in because Fia and Annie were narrating from entirely different timelines. It was particularly annoying for me when new characters were introduced in Fia's chapters as of "xxx days ago" and later appeared in Annie's chapters that were noted as "xxx months ago", which means he/she actually met Annie first based on the timeline but was written to interact with Fia first from the chapter orders. Wait, what? Huh? Though, I suppose this can be explained by my struggles with timelines in general.

After the shocking predicament that ended the first book, I was expecting so much more revelations and plot twists that would eventually unravel the mysteries surrounding the Keane Foundation. And then Fia and Annie would destroy it once for all with glory and excitement. But you know what? I did not get to know the Keane Foundation any better than I did by the end of MIND GAMES. Considering the fact that I knew basically nothing about it after finishing book one, you would think that this record isn't that hard to beat, but White managed to skitter around the corners and avoided this issue completely.

With only 230 pages (and line spaces at liberty), PERFECT LIES is such a short book and thus suffers much of its impediments - not able to tell a thorough story, not able to fully develop characters, and above all not able to appear as a book that is not hurried to be finished. I'm utterly torn between how much MIND GAMES impressed me and how much PERFECT LIES failed to do so that I have no idea how to give you all a fair verdict, maybe that you proceed with caution? At least it won't take you too long to finish the series if you do decide to read it.


My Rating:  (2 stars)

Comments (29)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Well. Poop. I don't remember if I was actually going to read Mind Games or not, but I don't think I am now if the sequel doesn't live up to the first book! The differing time periods and POVs does sound a little confusing. When you're dealing with different "times" and "presents", it's really important that you execute it properly, or else PLOT HOLES EVERYWHERE. I hate plot holes, so yep, probably going to stay out of this series.

Thanks for the review Angel! I'm glad you're reviewing for now hahah! :D
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
I agree that this wasn't as good as the first book, not even close, but still, my heart bled for poor Fia the entire time. Only the ending left me a bit disappointed, I wanted something more conclusive, something memorable, and it was kind of meh.
Fia is one of those characters that really stayed with me, though, so I suppose that's saying something.
My recent post Review: A Cursed Bloodline
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
Aw what a bummer! :( I really hate it when sequels disappoint me so much, makes me pissed to because HOW DARE YOU MAKE ME SO EXCITED AND TRICK ME INTO GETTING EXCITED FOR YOU. I actually heard from my co-blogger, Celine, that this one was better, but I guess this just proves that everyone has different tastes, eh? :D

Lovely review, Angel <33
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
The author should have written just one book, and didn't do the sequel..but then, the middle book usually sucks, not all, but most of them. I am sorry this book didn't live up to your expectations. It sucks when this happens. :(
My recent post Review 211 : This Night So Dark by Amie Kaufman, Meagan Spooner
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
Well that's too bad Angel! I would say this was a case of second book syndrome, but I'm not sure that even applies when the second book is also the final book in the series. I would have thought it to be action packed and full of revelations set up by the first book, but that clearly wasn't the case. Sorry it was a disappointment for you, especially since you loved the first book so much!
My recent post Review: A Thousand Pieces of You
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
Aww...I'm so sorry to hear that this was such a disappointing sequel! :( There's nothing worse than reading a book you really liked and the finding the sequel isn't as good. :( Personally, I didn't like Mind Games at all, so I have a feeling that I should just stay away from this. I did like Kiersten's Illusions of Fate though, so I'm interested in seeing what you think of that. :) Thanks for sharing Angel, and fabulous review! Hopefully your next read is better! <3

And OMG...YOU'RE BACK! I'M SO HAPPY! *throws confetti* I've missed you a ton! <3
My recent post Snow Like Ashes
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
Yikes! I'm sorry to hear that this was such a thorough disaster for you, Angel. I wasn't particularly fond of the first book, but it's terrible that this second book had nothing really going on for it. :/ Especially in the world building department. I would have wanted more for sure.
Great honest review!
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
Ugh, it's the absolutely WORST when sequels let you down, right?!! So far I've heard zero good things about it. :'( I actually didn't even like Mind Games, so I won't be going for it, but ohhhh, that's so frustrating about how confusing it is. WHAT EVEN. Just those combinations of backwards and forwards in time makes my brain spin.
Thanks for stopping by @ Notebook Sisters!
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
oh. OH. nooooo :(

aww man why why why does this have to happen!!!!! i LOVED mind games, finished it in one sitting and it was the weirdest, coolest book i've read all year. i was so looking forward to the sequel. man. i feel so sorry omg. this series had potential to go far, and i might have started to like annie a bit towards the end? thank you so much for warning us of this huge disappointment! *hugs*
My recent post odds and ends: starting a book blog?
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
Damn, sorry this was such a disappointment. I don't think you're alone with this though, a lot of people I know were disappointed in both books! I'm just glad I didn't bother with the first book (one of my trusted friends who knew my nitpicky ways warned me beforehand), especially if the sequel plummets the quality down. Hope your next read is better ^_^
My recent post Random Things in Motion #10: Relax… You Don’t Need to Fall in Love on The First Book!
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
I enjoyed this a little more than you did, but I definitely agree that it wasn't as good as Mind Games. I wasn't as connected to the characters, either, and I was disappointed with some of the plot developments. Thanks for the great, honest review!
My recent post Waiting on Wednesday: Crimson Bound by Rosamund Hodge
1 reply · active 543 weeks ago
Hmm, I just found Mind Games an okay book, so maybe that will mean that I'll really dislike this one...it's always so disappointing when characters that were awesome in one book seem to become underdeveloped and bland in a sequel.
And unresolved issues?! That's one of the things I dislike the most in a book...
My recent post Sci-Fi Month: Top Sci-fi Reads of 2014
1 reply · active 542 weeks ago
I haven't read Mind Games but I've heard so many great things about it. It's really a shame when the second book lets you down, especially when things you liked from the first book change in the second. Not sure if I'm going to check this series out... like you said, they are short though haha :)
My recent post Waiting on Wednesday [46]
1 reply · active 542 weeks ago
Aw, it's a shame you didn't like this one after loving Mind Games. I personally enjoyed White's Paranormalcy series - have you read that? - but since then, haven't found her other books - I haven't read Mind Games - as appealing. Hope your next read is better!
My recent post Review: The Cure for Dreaming by Cat Winters
1 reply · active 542 weeks ago

Post a new comment

Comments by